dear mr. aristotle.

while perusing the work of Atlanta based designer, Suzanne Kasler, i couldnt help but fixate on the relationship between art and design in the spaces she creates. many of her interiors go beyond complimenting the artworks-they almost match. 

which makes me wonder, what comes first? is Kasler inspired by a certain painting or sketch, using the piece to guide a color scheme, furniture, and finish selections? or is the process reversed...with the art selected to suit a prescribed program?

this chicken/ egg dilemma calls to question the importance of one art form maintaining its provenance when fused with another art form. that is to say, if a photograph was taken to communicate a certain message,  should that message be integrated into the design concept? or should the art mesh with the philosophy and schematics of a given space?

while it's a question of causality, one thing is verifiable: Kasler blends fine arts into her designs harmoniously. conversation exists between what hangs on the walls, sits in the corner, and covers the floors. 

so whichever route was taken, be it art first and sofa later-or vice versa-kasler's dynamic interiors are worth talking about. 

all photos from here.